Article share options
Share this on
Forward this by
- Copy link
A Hobart court has heard there clearly was nothing sinister or untoward when you look at the actions of the convicted rapist and killer as he joined up with numerous online dating sites, and utilized an alias on Facebook.
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it https://datingperfect.net/dating-sites/teenber-reviews-comparison is a sex offender that is registered
- The 64-year-old signed as much as sites that are dating utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis had been sentenced to 3 months’ prison for breaching their community security purchase by maybe perhaps perhaps not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis had been paroled in June year that is last serving 32 years for the duplicated rape and torture of a 19-year-old woman and also the murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is a sex that is registered and it is in the Community Protection sign up for life.
Among the list of conditions imposed on individuals in the register is the fact that they need certainly to report any phones that are mobile internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within days of their launch, Curtis had joined three internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, slutty Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account employing a fake title.
He used the Facebook messenger solution to deliver two communications to a lady he previously begun dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded responsible within the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and a restraining purchase.
Curtis has been doing custody since police searched their automobile and house in October this past year — seizing their cellular phone.
He had been additionally faced with fraudulence offences but those charges were dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no evidence today.
Curtis ‘not especially able utilizing the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a belated 1980s comprehension of technology” and “a naive concept of your skill with a mobile”.
“He was created in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled just last year, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
“the consequence of that has been that in 1986 as he decided to go to prison, he knew of computers but he did not get one … he previously very restricted usage of a computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been really someone placing a foot to the century that is 21st an awareness of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi stated that while Curtis had finalized to state he comprehended the conditions for the Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate from it with him on their phone, he failed to really have a practical comprehension of just what the net ended up being.
“He is certainly not especially able because of the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated their customer “thought that the web had been a fixed thing” that needed an even more active procedure to activate with and had been “naive” by what their cellular phone could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook had not been designed to avoid authorities detection, but alternatively that he would be the target of unwanted attention because of his past crimes because he was aware.
There is “nothing by itself untoward as to what Curtis had been doing on the web sites that are dating, his attorney stated.
Offences ‘not that serious’: magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated the breach had been accepted by him ended up being in component because Curtis was in fact in prison since 1986 and didn’t completely understand the online world.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis had not been doing such a thing dubious by having an alias on Twitter … I think many would accept that, including me personally that is additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe and it’s also truly an aggravating element. “
Not surprisingly, he stated the offences had been “not that serious”, but that any more offending may likely to see their face more imprisonment that is substantial.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis up to a jail that is three-month — backdated by half a year to take into consideration enough time he had invested in jail because the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase ended up being revoked during their amount of time in custody in which he shall have to re-apply to your Parole Board become re-released from jail